Re: Transactional DDL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Harpreet Dhaliwal
Subject Re: Transactional DDL
Date
Msg-id d86a77ef0706021351h7512e701k6d503de479cb81f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transactional DDL  ("Leif B. Kristensen" <leif@solumslekt.org>)
Responses Re: Transactional DDL  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-general
my bad.. i replied to that in a wrong thread. sorry

On 6/2/07, Leif B. Kristensen <leif@solumslekt.org> wrote:
On Saturday 2. June 2007 20:39, Ron Johnson wrote:
>You were politely asked not to top-post.
>
>On 06/02/07 11:46, Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
>> So, while writing any technical document, would it be wrong to
>> mention stored procedures in postgresql?
>> what is the general convention?
>
>Did I miss something?  What does "stored procedures" have to do with
>  "Transactional DDL"?

I believe that he posted this in reply to the "Stored procedures and
functions" thread. It kind of fits in there.
--
Leif Biberg Kristensen | Registered Linux User #338009
http://solumslekt.org/ | Cruising with Gentoo/KDE
My Jazz Jukebox: http://www.last.fm/user/leifbk/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Michael Nolan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Corruption of files in PostgreSQL
Next
From: Andreas
Date:
Subject: Need a wee bit more info on PostgreSQL's SSL security options