Re: Transactional DDL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Leif B. Kristensen
Subject Re: Transactional DDL
Date
Msg-id 200706022152.14013.leif@solumslekt.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transactional DDL  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Responses Re: Transactional DDL  ("Harpreet Dhaliwal" <harpreet.dhaliwal01@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Saturday 2. June 2007 20:39, Ron Johnson wrote:
>You were politely asked not to top-post.
>
>On 06/02/07 11:46, Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
>> So, while writing any technical document, would it be wrong to
>> mention stored procedures in postgresql?
>> what is the general convention?
>
>Did I miss something?  What does "stored procedures" have to do with
>  "Transactional DDL"?

I believe that he posted this in reply to the "Stored procedures and
functions" thread. It kind of fits in there.
--
Leif Biberg Kristensen | Registered Linux User #338009
http://solumslekt.org/ | Cruising with Gentoo/KDE
My Jazz Jukebox: http://www.last.fm/user/leifbk/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Transactional DDL
Next
From: "Michael Nolan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Corruption of files in PostgreSQL