2005/12/15, Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>:
> > Le Mardi 13 Décembre 2005 00:48, Guillaume LELARGE a écrit:
> > > Le Samedi 10 Décembre 2005 16:55, Andreas Pflug a écrit:
> > > > Dave Page wrote:
> > > > >>I still think this patch should be applied.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone see a reason /not/ to do this?
> > > >
> > > > Hm, Guillaume started a thread on pgsql-hackers about
> > renaming system
> > > > schemas in general, maybe we should wait for the result of that
> > > > discussion.
> > >
> > > Well, it seems that pg_* schemas are system schemas and
> > that public and
> > > information_schema schemas are public one. I think we
> > should exclude system
> > > schemas depending on their names and show public and
> > information_schema,
> > > whatever their actual name are.
> > >
> > > I can bring a new patch if you agree with this and if you
> > find this useful.
> >
> > What about this one ?
>
> I've applied a modified version of this patch - thanks.
>
I'm OK with your changes. Thanks for applying.
--
Guillaume.
