On 20/08/2016 15:41, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> If we want to specifically name the recovery_target_lsn in the message, we
>> could probably do it using context.
>
> So that would be basically assigning error_context_stack for each item
> parsed for recovery.conf? That seems a bit narrow as usually
> recovery.conf is not that long..
>
That'd still be an improvement, since the error message doesn't even
mention that the error comes from recovery.conf. I agree it can't come
from many places, but it may be useful for some people.
--
Julien Rouhaud
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
