Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 09.06.21 04:51, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:57:45PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> test deadlock-simple              ... ok           20 ms
>> test deadlock-hard                ... ok        10624 ms
>> test deadlock-soft                ... ok          147 ms
>> test deadlock-soft-2              ... ok         5154 ms
>> test deadlock-parallel            ... ok          132 ms
>> test detach-partition-concurrently-1 ... ok          553 ms
>> test detach-partition-concurrently-2 ... ok          234 ms
>> test detach-partition-concurrently-3 ... ok         2389 ms
>> test detach-partition-concurrently-4 ... ok         1876 ms
>> Make the test output visually consistent, as previously done by commit
>> 14378245.
> Not bad, but I would instead shorten the names to detach-[1234] or
> detach-partition-[1234].  The marginal value of the second word is low, and
> the third word helps even less.

DETACH CONCURRENTLY is a separate feature from plain DETACH.

But "partition" is surely redundant here.