Re: Why overhead of SPI is so large? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Konstantin Knizhnik
Subject Re: Why overhead of SPI is so large?
Date
Msg-id d1568385-7344-d5b4-fc8f-0c9dcb02bbff@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why overhead of SPI is so large?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Why overhead of SPI is so large?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I've set the CF entry to "Waiting on Author" pending a new patch
> that does it like that.

With contain_mutable_functions the patch becomes trivial.

-- 
Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeevan Chalke
Date:
Subject: Re: backup manifests
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: fix "Success" error messages