Alex wrote:
> Hi,
> i recently run pgbench against different servers and got some results I
> dont quite understand.
>
> A) EV1: Dual Xenon, 2GHz, 1GB Memory, SCSI 10Krpm, RHE3
> B) Dual Pentium3 1.4ghz (Blade), SCSI Disk 10Krmp, 1GB Memory, Redhat 8
> C) P4 3.2GHz, IDE 7.2Krpm, 1GBMem, Fedora Core2
>
> Runnig PGbench reported
> A) 220 tps
> B) 240 tps
> C) 510 tps
>
> Running hdparm reported
> A) 920mb/s (SCSI 10k)
> B) 270mb/s (SCSI 10k)
> C) 1750mb/s (IDE 7.2k)
>
> What I dont quite understand is why a P3.2 is twice as fast as a Dual
> Xenon with SCSI disks, A dual Xenon 2GHz is not faster than a dual P3
> 1.4Ghz, and the hdparm results also dont make much sense.
A few things to clear up about the P3/P4/Xeons.
Xeons are P4s. Hence, a P4 2ghz will run the same speed as a Xeon 2ghz
assuming all other variables are the same. Of course they aren't because
your P4 is probably running unregistered memory, uses either a 533mhz or
800mhz FSB compared to the Xeon's shared 400mhz amongs 2 CPUs, running a
faster non-smp kernel. Add all those variables up and it's definitely
possible for a P4 3.2ghz to run twice as fast as a Dual Xeon 2ghz on a
single-thread benchmark. (The corollary here is that in a multi-thread
benchmark, the 2X Xeon can only hope to equal your P4 3.2.)
P3s are faster than P4s at the same clock rate. By a lot. It's not
really that surprising that a P3 1.4 is faster than a P4/Xeon 2.0. I've
seen results like this many times over a wide range of applications.
The only variable that is throwing off your comparisons are the hard
drives. IDE drives have write caching on by default -- SCSI drives have
it off. Use: hdparm -W0 /dev/hda to turn it off on the P4 system and
rerun the tests then.
