Re: PostgreSQL suitable? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andreas Kretschmer
Subject Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Date
Msg-id cff943da-1ed4-4002-ea01-7cf20edec4d2@a-kretschmer.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL suitable?  (Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.romano@notorand.it>)
List pgsql-general

Am 19.12.2017 um 15:58 schrieb Vincenzo Romano:
> But accordingly to a discussion with Bruce Momjan, table partitionin 
> V10 is little more than syntactic sugar around old-fashioned table 
> partitioning.

there is always room for improvements, but table-partitioning in pg10 is 
much, much better then before.
(there was a impressive talk about that: 

https://www.postgresql.eu/events/schedule/pgconfeu2017/session/1643-everything-wrong-with-partitioning-in-postgresql-10/

)

Regards, Andreas

-- 
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Next
From: Melvin Davidson
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: PostgreSQL needs percentage function