Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PostgreSQL suitable? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vincenzo Romano
Subject Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Date
Msg-id CAHjZ2x6nq3_W3BxzX2tPWZE5Y-yTWXTbniqLb2xo2N+EqbiACQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL suitable?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
List pgsql-general
Tree view
Sorry, my bad: I confused V10 with v11.
But accordingly to a discussion with Bruce Momjan, table partitionin V10 is little more than syntactic sugar around old-fashioned table partitioning.
Sub-table partition selection is linear in complexity.

Il 19 dic 2017 15:55, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> ha scritto:
Vincenzo Romano wrote:
> I've not tested PG10. But it's not released for production yet!

It definitely is, for a couple of months now.  10.1 (the first bugfix
release) has been out for over a month.

--
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tim Clarke
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?