Re: partition tree inspection functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: partition tree inspection functions
Date
Msg-id ca1e091f-9b49-0fc0-e6f3-00b8e8b0311d@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partition tree inspection functions  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: partition tree inspection functions  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018/10/05 14:56, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:18:07PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> So it seems that I am clearly outvoted here ;)
>>
>> Okay, let's do as you folks propose.
> 
> And attached is a newer version with this isleaf stuff and the previous
> feedback from Amit integrated, as long as I recall about it.  The
> version is indented, and tutti-quanti.  Does that look fine to everybody
> here?

Thanks for making those changes yourself and posting the new version.

Can you check the attached diff file for some updates to the documentation
part of the patch.  Other parts look fine.

Thanks,
Amit

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade failed with ERROR: null relpartbound for relation18159 error.
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive andanti-wraparound ru