Re: Function scan FDW pushdown - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Pyhalov
Subject Re: Function scan FDW pushdown
Date
Msg-id c6de48bf1f09e2c1a22b5f680d4d9099@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread
In response to Re: Function scan FDW pushdown  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SQL:2011 Application Time Update & Delete
List pgsql-hackers
Alexander Korotkov писал(а) 2026-08-15 03:49:
> Hi!
> 
>> Hi. I've updated comment a bit, as we currently have to handle NULL
>> records correctly,
>> this is not a nice-to-have feature which we need for future changes to
>> be more safe.
> 
> Thank you. I've further improved that comment.  Also, I've revised the
> cost calculation in init_func_stub_fpinfo() to reflect the cost of the
> function execution on the remote side.  I have to edit the regression
> test query to reliably exercise the pushdown.
> 
> ------
> Regards,
> Alexander Korotkov
> Supabase

Hi.
Looks good to me.
-- 
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
Postgres Professional



Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yugo Nagata
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename EXISTS-to-ANY converted subplan to exists_to_any
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Failing assertion while taking a restartpoint during crash recovery