Hi!
> Hi. I've updated comment a bit, as we currently have to handle NULL
> records correctly,
> this is not a nice-to-have feature which we need for future changes to
> be more safe.
Thank you. I've further improved that comment. Also, I've revised the
cost calculation in init_func_stub_fpinfo() to reflect the cost of the
function execution on the remote side. I have to edit the regression
test query to reliably exercise the pushdown.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase
