Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
Subject Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes
Date
Msg-id c48dc783-f5ed-a626-5fc4-4a50829ba87d@8kdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 11/05/17 09:20, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 05/11/2017 07:03 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> 
>> wrote:
>>> I have added this as an open item because we will have to wait to see
>>> where we are with driver support as the release gets closer.
>>
>> As Postgres ODBC now has a hard dependency with libpq, no actions is
>> taken from there. At least this makes one driver worth mentioning.
>
> FWIW, I wrote a patch for the Go driver at https://github.com/lib/pq, 
> to implement SCRAM. It's awaiting review.
>
> I updated the List of Drivers in the Wiki. I added a few drivers that 
> were missing, like the ODBC driver, and the pgtclng driver, as well as 
> a Go and Rust driver that I'm aware of. I reformatted it, and added a 
> column to indicate whether each driver uses libpq or not.
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/List_of_drivers
>
> There is a similar list in our docs:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/external-interfaces.html
>
> Should we update the list in the docs, adding every driver we know of? 
> Or curate the list somehow, adding only more popular drivers? Or 
> perhaps add a link to the Wiki page from the docs?
>
> We can use this list in the Wiki to track which drivers implement SCRAM.


    I have just submitted a PR to add SCRAM support for pgjdbc: 
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/842
    Thread on the pgjdbc-list: 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/95dea232-aeeb-d619-e917-abf32b44ef8a%408kdata.com
    Hopefully it will be merged soon, and the list of drivers could 
then be updated with this.

    Álvaro

-- 

Álvaro Hernández Tortosa


-----------
<8K>data




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table
Next
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken