Re: Transactional DDL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: Transactional DDL
Date
Msg-id c2d9e70e0706021551u294480advf446fece78e41962@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transactional DDL  (Russ Brown <pickscrape@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
> > On 6/2/07, *Jasbinder Singh Bali* <jsbali@gmail.com
> > <mailto:jsbali@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 6/2/07, *Michael Glaesemann* < grzm@seespotcode.net
> >     <mailto:grzm@seespotcode.net>> wrote:
> >
> >         On Jun 2, 2007, at 11:08 , Harpreet Dhaliwal wrote:
> >
> >         > Whats so novel about postgresql here?
> >         > This would happen in any RDBMS. right?
> >         > You induced divide by zero exception that crashed the whole
> >         > transaction and it did not create the table bar?
> >
>
> No, it doesn't
>

then informix is better than oracle in this point. last time i try
this on informix it did the right thing...

sadly enough, i don't have an informix database at hand to confirm if
my memory has no corrupted indexes ;)

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the universe trying
to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the universe is winning."
                                       Richard Cook

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Jaime Casanova"
Date:
Subject: Re: Transactional DDL
Next
From: "Alexander Staubo"
Date:
Subject: Re: High-availability