Re: Disk Keeper - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: Disk Keeper
Date
Msg-id c2d9e70e0512011008s162d5ecfs1909edaca1fd867@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Disk Keeper  ("David Saunders" <dsaunders99@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 12/1/05, David Saunders <dsaunders99@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has any body got any experience of using Disk Keeper on Windows (On line
> defragmenter) on the same machine as a PostgreSQL server. We are proposing
> to use it but do not know if it will have any adverse effects on the overall
> performance of the Postgres Server. If anybody is already using this or any
> other defragmentation tool can you let me know.
>
> Many Thanks in advance
>

i don't think this is a good idea... in windows autovacuum is enable
by default (IIRC) and i think will be a conflict if your
defragmentation tool try to work just when autovacuum decides to work
too...

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: interval behaviour
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?