Re: interval behaviour - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: interval behaviour
Date
Msg-id 15260.1133460528@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to interval behaviour  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
Responses Re: interval behaviour
List pgsql-general
Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> writes:
> Reading through the sql2003 spec, it would appear that the "proper" way
> to represent an interval would be:

> interval '10' day

This is not actually implemented.  The bizarre special-purpose syntax
the spec requires for datetime literals was something that was on Tom
Lockhart's to-do list, but when he got bored and left the project,
nobody else picked it up.  I'm not entirely certain how much work
remains to handle the spec syntax.  In the real world, the form we
do support is a lot better (can you imagine trying to programmatically
insert interval parameter values into a statement using the spec's
syntax?  Yech.)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Finding uniques across a big join
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: Disk Keeper