Re: Function to promote standby servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ian Barwick
Subject Re: Function to promote standby servers
Date
Msg-id c255f8fa-bbb5-ab89-e45f-136175e3b021@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Function to promote standby servers  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi

On 10/25/2018 09:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> And committed.  I double-checked the code, and tweaked a bit the tests
> so as the test using wait_mode = false is removed as it did not seem
> worth the extra cycles.  I also added a check on the return value of
> pg_promote when using the wait mode.  Another thing was that the
> function needs to be parallel-restricted.

Documentation for this [*] says "Returns true if promotion is successful and false otherwise",
which is not correct if "wait" is false, as it will always return TRUE.

[*] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/functions-admin.html#FUNCTIONS-RECOVERY-CONTROL

Attached patch contains a suggested rewording to clarify this.


Regards

Ian Barwick

-- 
  Ian Barwick                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
  PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
Next
From: Ian Barwick
Date:
Subject: Re: Function to promote standby servers