-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
(Wow. I cannot recall a time I've seen so many posts that just make
me shake my head in sadness. It's painfully obvious that a code of
conduct is way outside the wheelhouse of many of the participants
in this thread.)
> Below please find a WIP CoC for the PostgreSQL.Org project:
> PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PGDG) Code of Conduct (CoC):
Nitpick: PGDG is not used. And perhaps "PostgreSQL" alone is enough?
> 2. The CoC is not about being offended. The act of being offended is
> purely a recipient response and usually the offended individual is more
> interested in being a victim than moving forward.
Too defensive; not needed in the code of conduct.
> 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free
> comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical
> appearance, body size or race.
Already addressed upthread; mostly agree with the direction it is heading.
> 4. Any sustained disruption of the collaborative space (mailing lists,
> IRC etc..) or other PostgreSQL events shall be construed as a violation
> of the CoC and appropriate action will be taken by the CoC committee.
Too specific, covered by #1. Also, no definition of "CoC committee".
> 5. The CoC is only about interaction with the PostgreSQL community. Your
> private and public lives outside of the PostgreSQL community are your own.
Needed? I know part of a code of conduct is stating the obvious, but...
> 6. The CoC is not about Social Justice.
Really no need for this. Defensive, and introduces a loaded term.
Thanks, JD, for pushing this forward.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201601112116
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAlaUYisACgkQvJuQZxSWSsirmgCg6o54wXRWLUyn0bgtP1tFgC46
TCEAniJ1KuhJ7vju7chbxfgWBuZ7qAk0
=wZcI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
