On 13.01.23 11:01, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> So I'm feeling quite good about the end result -- I set out hoping not
> to make performance noticeably worse, but ended up making it
> significantly better.
This is great! How do you want to proceed? You also posted an updated
patch in the "underscores" thread and suggested some additional work
there. In which order should these be addressed, in your opinion?
