On 26 March 2010 00:14, Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On 3/26/10 2:01 AM +0200, Thom Brown wrote:
>>
>> I was wondering if it might be worth making ROW/ROWS optional for
>> OFFSET and FETCH clauses? And can ONLY be optional too?
>
> AIUI the only time you'd want to use that syntax is when you want to write
> (theoretically) portable code, and making parts of the syntax optional is
> just breaking that portability. We already have a non-portable,
> non-standard syntax.
>
I understand. If that's the case I'll concede the point. :)
Thanks
Thom