On 7 February 2010 10:49, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 7 February 2010 10:20, Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The post about the dev docs needing more hot standby mentions prompted
>>> me to have a look at how streaming replication is documented. Ignore
>>> this if this has already been discussed (I couldn't find any posts),
>>> but I couldn't find any mention of streaming replication except in the
>>> write ahead log configuration. There doesn't seem to be anything in
>>> the index linked to a description of this major feature, why you would
>>> use it, or how it works. There's also no mention in the release
>>> overview.
>>>
>>> This is probably due to it being a work in progress and hasn't been
>>> written yet, but thought I'd raise it just in case.
>>
>> Okay, after some searching, I found some sections on streaming
>> replication not referenced in the index:
>>
>> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/warm-standby.html#STREAMING-REPLICATION
>>
>> Streaming Replication Protocol:
>> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/protocol-replication.html
>>
>> Main section about Streaming Replication: Maybe these should get
>> indexed under streaming replication?
>
> Yeah, as you noticed, the documentation for streaming replication is
> currently non-existent. That obviously needs to be fixed. I think we
> need to move the existing sections around, and of course add a lot of
> documentation for the new streaming replication and hot standby specific
> stuff. I proposed a new layout here:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4B50A600.3090309@enterprisedb.com
>
> which people seemed to agree with. If you want to help with that,
> perhaps the best starting point would be to start writing text for the
> new chapters of that new layout.
>
I'm wondering if I "gave it a go", I'd be more of a hindrance than a
help, as I'm not really familiar enough with the workings of hot
standby to provide this missing information. In fact that's why I
looked for the documentation, because I wanted to learn how it works
and how to use it. I'd be happy to review any doc changes to ensure
enough information is available and that it's clear enough to
end-users though.
And I do prefer the proposed layout.
Thom
