Re: [pgsql-www] UKPUG and using the PUGs site - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: [pgsql-www] UKPUG and using the PUGs site
Date
Msg-id bddc86150910161827r41fdd648l8d478d4aaa00d67d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-www] UKPUG and using the PUGs site  (Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
2009/10/17 Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie@gmail.com>:
> Some user groups are a bit more formal - with actual bylaws, and rules
> about membership and maybe even membership dues. The US user groups
> are as a rule very informal - no special membership requirements, and
> meetings open to all. I believe the UK group has a similar structure,
> but again, I defer to Dave/Simon. :)
>
> Generally, I try to help people get together to talk about Postgres
> stuff regardless of what kind of organization they've got. And when
> people are traveling that are part of the development or advocacy
> groups, we try to arrange for them to meet up with locals.
>
> This is a good mailing list to subscribe to if you're interested in
> those types of things.
>

Thanks for the info! :)  As it happens I'm already subscribed to the
advocacy list, but I forgot it was there.  I'm looking to become less
of a passive end-user and more of an active community member, possibly
making contributions where I can.  I've already made a start on that
by contacting the Joomla community to get my extensive code changes to
the Joomla codebase tested and reviewed which prepares it for multi-DB
support (as opposed to the MySQL-only option at the momenet),
including the Postgres hander I added (which looks to all be working
fine for the most part).

Well I'll see how things go after the conference.

Thom

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Selena Deckelmann
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] UKPUG and using the PUGs site
Next
From: Tom Copeland
Date:
Subject: Re: strange postgresql x mysql comparison in forrester analyse