Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0
Date
Msg-id bd02c46e-6dfe-362e-16ee-6f6bb8f9468b@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/30/18 21:55, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'm open to changing my mind on it, but it seems a bit weird that a
> feature that relies on a shlib being installed magically turns itself on
> if avaible. And leaving that angle aside, ISTM, that it's a complex
> enough feature that it should be opt-in the first release... Think we
> roughly did that right for e.g. parallellism.

That sounds reasonable, for both of those reasons.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach