Re: worker_spi.naptime in worker_spi example - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: worker_spi.naptime in worker_spi example
Date
Msg-id bbdb928f-729e-a50f-96a4-259b12ea8d00@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to worker_spi.naptime in worker_spi example  (Jeremy Finzel <finzelj@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: worker_spi.naptime in worker_spi example  (Jeremy Finzel <finzelj@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 03/15/2018 10:59 AM, Jeremy Finzel wrote:

> WaitLatch function the same variable worker_spi_naptime without referencing
> the configuration created in _PG_init.  Am I missing something here?

You can see the declaration of that variable up on line 56.
It's just an int variable static to worker_spi.c.

The code you saw in _PG_init registers that variable to the
Grand Unified Configuration system (you can see where the address
of the variable, &worker_spi_naptime, is passed in that registration),
so the GUC system can handle setting or querying the value from SQL
(and config files, etc.).

You can read more about the GUC system in
src/backend/utils/misc/README, src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c, and
src/include/utils/guc.h.

-Chap


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: WaitLatchOrSocket optimization