On 10.06.26 11:12, Chao Li wrote:
>> fter reading the other implementation in [1], I realized that I had missed the partial-index case, so I added
coveragefor that.
>>
>> I am still sending an updated version of this patch because my implementation is different from the one in [1]. I
wouldlike people to compare the two approaches and decide which direction is better.
>>
>> [1]https://postgr.es/m/
>> CAJTYsWXOkyeDVbzymWc9sKrq7Y_MUv6XJXN4H9GfsBOPd3NJ+w@mail.gmail.com
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Chao Li (Evan)
>> HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
>> https://www.highgo.com/
>>
>>
> Oops! Forgot the attachment. Here comes it.
This has been addressed via the patch in the other thread.
