On 24.06.26 18:39, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 2:54 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>>
>> I have checked the patch v9 0002 "Move FOR PORTION OF volatile check
>> into planner". Functionality-wise, this seems correct.
>>
>> Could you explain why you used EXPRKIND_TARGET? Maybe there is a good
>> reason, but otherwise it seems kind of arbitrary.
>
> This expression is used in the target list to set the application-time
> column. We intersect the old value with the FOR PORTION OF bounds.
>
>> The new ereport call in planner.c has some funny parentheses: You have
>> parentheses around errmsg, but not around errcode. This is probably
>> because of the way this was copy and pasted from its previous location.
>
> Here are new patches with the parens cleaned up.
Ok, I have committed that v10 0002 patch. I will look at the other one
next.