Re: scheduler in core - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: scheduler in core
Date
Msg-id b42b73151002221042m1759804m1317bc0f47e4b197@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: scheduler in core  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: scheduler in core
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>
> That doesn't mean it isn't a really good idea. It would be nice to have
> a comprehensive job scheduling solution that allows me to continue
> abstract away from external solutions and operating system dependencies.

+1!

Aa scheduler is an extremely common thing to have to integrate with
the database.  All of our commercial competitors have them, and they
are heavily used.

Like I noted above, what people want to schedule is going to be stored
procedures.  Having both would virtually eliminate the need for
scripting outside the database, which is a pretty big deal since
external scripts are a real pain to keep cross platform.  Since
there's probably a lot of overlapping problems in those two features,
why not tackle both at once?

merlin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: tie user processes to postmaster was:(Re: [HACKERS] scheduler in core)
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL