Re: commercial adaptation of postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: commercial adaptation of postgres
Date
Msg-id b42b73150907211127g4038b58fgb9242a62331ee7a2@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to commercial adaptation of postgres  (Dennis Gearon <gearond@sbcglobal.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Dennis Gearon<gearond@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> I once talked to a company that made a custome version of Postgres. It split tables up on columns and also by rows,
hadsome other custome features. It was enormously faster from what I gathered. 

Faster at some things :-).  column oriented db is a tradeoff...it's
less work to get one or two columns but your record is not guaranteed
to be in one place on disk...which has obvious downsides.  I don't
have any evidence other than my gut, but I betcha column db being an
'evolutionary step' above current methods is mostly hype.  However for
certain workloads I'm sure it's great...

merlin

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: killing processes
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: element from an array by its index