Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch
Date
Msg-id b42b73150808240630r59ad34f3l24a980280cdc52d9@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> I assume there is no TODO here.

Well, there doesn't seem to be a TODO for partial/restartable vacuums,
which were mentioned upthread.  This is a really desirable feature for
big databases and removes one of the reasons to partition large
tables.

merlin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Next
From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain"
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql