Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch
Date
Msg-id 48B1831F.7010002@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch  ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch  ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> I assume there is no TODO here.
> 
> Well, there doesn't seem to be a TODO for partial/restartable vacuums,
> which were mentioned upthread.  This is a really desirable feature for
> big databases and removes one of the reasons to partition large
> tables.

I would agree that partial vacuums would be very useful.

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> merlin
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: What in the world is happening on spoonbill?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal sql: labeled function params