The COMMENT ref page says (and SECURITY LABEL similarly):
The name of the object to be commented. Names of tables,
aggregates, collations, ..., and views can be schema-qualified.
and it lists all such possible object types. I find this tedious to
read. (And there are omissions. For example materialized views are not
listed.) I wonder if it would be more practical to just write:
The name of the object to be commented. Names of objects that live
in schemas (tables, functions, etc.) can be schema-qualified.
There are also examples at the end that cover this if there is any doubt.
Patch attached. Thoughts?
