Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0
Date
Msg-id b04c2f5a2d353b052164879376f24329@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Another point is that since the ODBC driver is C anyway, there are no
> cross-language issues for it in relying on libpq.  This is quite
> different IMHO from the situation for JDBC, or DBD::Pg, where there are
> advantages in having a single-language solution.
This is not so much of an issue with DBD::Pg - it already uses quite a
bit of C code[1]. not only from libpq, but because DBI is written in C, and
because it is handy sometimes to use non-libpq pgsql code, such as some
of the quoting stuff. Having libpq is definitely a bonus for us (DBD::Pg),
and we've never really had an issue with libpq until now, and it's getting
fixed, so no worries.
[1] Well, C and pseudo-C XS code anyway.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200409202318
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFBT52RvJuQZxSWSsgRAvWXAJ9FTLnVzFULYKEF1Z16EnNJw6BxewCdFHW5
13hbl5M6pT9+oezDpAVetIM=
=Dpjb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: RSS
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Others applying patch queue patches