Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Is Oracle using Gitlab Failure againstPostgreSQL? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Martín Marqués
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Is Oracle using Gitlab Failure againstPostgreSQL?
Date
Msg-id b0127fa6-9c32-64f7-bcb3-ac42b266e105@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PG-Advocacy] Is Oracle using Gitlab Failureagainst PostgreSQL?  ("Gunnar \"Nick\" Bluth" <gunnar.bluth.extern@elster.de>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Is Oracle using Gitlab Failure against PostgreSQL?  (Wei Shan <weishan.ang@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
El 10/02/17 a las 05:01, Gunnar "Nick" Bluth escribió:
>
>> Question is, is there anything Postgres can really learn from this failure?
>
> Maybe re-order the docs? From what they made public, it seemed they
> either started backing up with a 7.x or early 8.x release and never
> adjusted the procedure to the new possibilities (LVM snapshots?!?
> Really?!?) or they stopped reading too early... :/

Simon Riggs wrote a nice blog after the incident, which IMO details the
flaws in the incident, with the conclusion that postgres wasn't in fault
there.

http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/dataloss-at-gitlab/

I don't think the issue they had has anything to do with how the
documentation is organized. This was just bad system administration
policies (you can see a bunch of changes they did after the incident
which aim at preventing from happening again).

In particular, the same problem would have happened with any database
engine, including Oracle. (I'm taking about the administrator deleting
all the data files)

Regards,

--
Martín Marqués                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Gunnar \"Nick\" Bluth"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PG-Advocacy] Is Oracle using Gitlab Failureagainst PostgreSQL?
Next
From: Wei Shan
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Is Oracle using Gitlab Failure against PostgreSQL?