Re: pg_resetwal: refuse to run when backup_label exists - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_resetwal: refuse to run when backup_label exists
Date
Msg-id asQlc0x7FPjAWdvJ@paquier.xyz
Whole thread
In response to Re: pg_resetwal: refuse to run when backup_label exists  (Joao Detomini <joao.detomini@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: pg_resetwal: refuse to run when backup_label exists
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 12:04:14PM -0300, Joao Detomini wrote:
> Nothing to change from my side, v3 looks fine to me.  I'll put it
> back to Needs review for now, since Michael hasn't said whether he's
> ok with -f not overriding the check.

I'm maybe just not seeing the value of the patch, then, that's all, so
I doubt that my opinion has any value.

Please note that the community mailing lists follow the following
style in terms of message posting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Bottom-posting
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL segment file descriptor leak on read errors can PANIC the server
Next
From: Mihail Nikalayeu
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical replication: lost updates/deletes and invalid log messages caused by SnapshotDirty + concurrent updates