On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 07:32 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I'm maybe just not seeing the value of the patch, then, that's all, so
> I doubt that my opinion has any value.
That's fine, thanks for taking a look.
> Please note that the community mailing lists follow the following
> style in terms of message posting:
Noted, sorry about that.
Shihao, I'm moving the entry to Ready for Committer. The code and
tests look good to me, and the question of whether -f should be able
to override the check is left for the committer to decide.
Regards,
João Marcelo
On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 12:04:14PM -0300, Joao Detomini wrote:
> Nothing to change from my side, v3 looks fine to me. I'll put it
> back to Needs review for now, since Michael hasn't said whether he's
> ok with -f not overriding the check.
I'm maybe just not seeing the value of the patch, then, that's all, so
I doubt that my opinion has any value.
Please note that the community mailing lists follow the following
style in terms of message posting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Bottom-posting
--
Michael
