Re: REPACK ONLY is accepted but ignored - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: REPACK ONLY is accepted but ignored
Date
Msg-id apL592Gh2m8qBEef@nathan
Whole thread
In response to Re: REPACK ONLY is accepted but ignored  (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Fix null pointer dereference in PG19
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Aug 29, 2026 at 03:34:42PM +0200, Antonin Houska wrote:
> At the moment, I can't think of other reason for using the 'vacuum_relation'
> rule than the effort to replace both CLUSTER and VACUUM FULL. Unfortunately it
> appears that the difference in the command arguments was missed.  What you
> propose LGTM, thanks.

Committed, thanks for looking.

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible race condition in pg_basebackup
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) rewrites tables marked with user_catalog_table