Re: send/receive buffer size - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Scott Harrington
Subject Re: send/receive buffer size
Date
Msg-id alpine.WNT.2.00.1209120641550.3604@corsica
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: send/receive buffer size  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Thank you Dave, will you consider the localAddress patch also?

On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Dave Cramer wrote:

> I've applied this patch with changes to use camelCase for
> sendBufferSize, and receiveBufferSize to 9.2
> Originally supplied by Bernd Helme
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
> http://www.credativ.ca
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Scott Harrington <scotth01@sns-usa.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Shijun Kong wrote:
>>
>>> I read a thread somewhere that somebody contributed a patch for adding
>>> support of configurable send/receive buffer size. Did it ever commit into
>>> master branch? I did not see any commit message about this change for last
>>> 12 months.
>>
>>
>> I wondered the same last weekend and found that the patch had NOT yet found
>> its way into pgjdbc on github. In case it helps you, I've attached that old
>> patch in a form that should apply cleanly against the latest sources (unless
>> something's changed in the last 10 days).
>>
>> Before merging, maintainers would probably want to rename the property names
>> (which have underscores in this patch) to better conform to the other driver
>> properties which use camelcaps for the most part.
>>
>> I have also attached a "localAddress" patch that I find useful (I think I
>> posted it myself a while ago, but in any case here's an updated patch that
>> should apply more cleanly against recent sources).
>>
>> -Scott
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: DocSea - Patrice Delorme
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal
Next
From: "Albe Laurenz"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal