Re: The current shape of PG master-slave replication - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From pgsql-admin@kolttonen.fi
Subject Re: The current shape of PG master-slave replication
Date
Msg-id alpine.LFD.2.21.1811160701360.25223@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The current shape of PG master-slave replication  (Payal Singh <payal@omniti.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, Payal Singh wrote:

> It is more reliable than default MySQL replication. Default MySQL
> replication is logical whereas default postgres replication is binary. In
> the crudest of terms, if something goes wrong you can't just 'skip'
> statements in postgres to get replication to work like you can in MySQL.
> This ensures better data integrity during replication. As for non-defaults,
> pg10 and onwards support logical replication as well, with the usual
> caveats that logical replication comes with in any database.

I see. Thanks for that explanation. 

I really have to study these DB things a bit more in order to gain better 
understanding of replication's basic models and structure.

Best regards,
Unto Sten


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: pgsql-admin@kolttonen.fi
Date:
Subject: Re: The current shape of PG master-slave replication
Next
From: Achilleas Mantzios
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 10.5 : Logical replication timeout results in PANIC inpg_wal "No space left on device"