Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua Kramer
Subject Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date
Msg-id alpine.LFD.2.00.1105031427360.7329@home-av-server.home-av
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  (Ian Bailey-Leung <ian@hardcircle.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
> Part of the problem is the name we're using for the feature.  "Unlogged
> tables" sounds like we've taken something away and are calling that a
> feature.  "Now with no brakes!"  As feature names go, it's as unsexy as

Logless tables?

Log-Free tables?

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Gilberto Castillo Martínez
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory