Hello Greg,
> It looks like David sent a patch and Fabien sent a followup patch. But
> there hasn't been a whole lot of discussion or further patches.
>
> It sounds like there are some basic questions about what the right
> interface should be. Are there specific questions that would be
> helpful for moving forward?
Review the designs and patches and tell us what you think?
Personnaly, I think that allowing multiple connections is a good thing,
especially if the code impact is reduced, which is the case with the
version I sent.
Then for me the next step would be to have a reconnection on errors so as
to implement a client-side failover policy that could help testing a
server-failover performance impact. I have done that internally but it
requires that "Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors" to land, as it
would just be another error that can be handled.
--
Fabien.
