Re: pg_ls_tmpdir to show directories and shared filesets (andpg_ls_*) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hello Justin,

>>  psql> SELECT * FROM pg_ls_dir_recurse('.');
>>  ERROR:  could not stat file
"./base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo/base/foo":
Toomany levels of symbolic links
 
>>  CONTEXT:  SQL function "pg_ls_dir_recurse" statement 1
>>
>> This probably means using lstat instead of (in supplement to?) stat, and
>> probably tell if something is a link, and if so not recurse in them.
>
> Thanks for looking.
>
> I think that opens up a can of worms.  I don't want to go into the business of
> re-implementing all of find(1) - I count ~128 flags (most of which take
> arguments).  You're referring to find -L vs find -P, and some people would want
> one and some would want another.  And don't forget about find -H...

This is not the point. The point is that a link can change a finite tree 
into cyclic graph, and you do not want to delve into that, ever.

The "find" command, by default, does not recurse into a link because of 
said problem, and the user *must* ask for it and assume the infinite loop 
if any.

So if you implement one behavior, it should be not recursing into links. 
Franckly, I would not provide the recurse into link alternative, but it 
could be implemented if someone wants it, and the problem that come with 
it.

> pg_stat_file doesn't expose the file type (I guess because it's not portable?),

You are right that Un*x and Windows are not the same wrt link. It seems 
that there is already something about that in port:

   "./src/port/dirmod.c:pgwin32_is_junction(const char *path)"

So most of the details are already hidden.

> and I think it's outside the scope of this patch to change that.  Maybe it
> suggests that the pg_ls_dir_recurse patch should be excluded.

IMHO, I really think that it should be included. Dealing with links is no 
big deal, but you need an additional column in _metadata to tell it is a 
link, and there is a ifdef because testing is a little different between 
unix and windows. I'd guess around 10-20 lines of code added.

> ISTM if someone wants to recursively list a directory, they should avoid
> putting cycles there, or permission errors, or similar.

Hmmm. I'd say the user should like to be able to call the function and 
never have a bad experience with it such as a failure on an infinite loop.

> Or they should write their own C extension that borrows from 
> pg_ls_dir_files but handles more arguments.

ISTM that the point of your patch is to provide the basic tool needed to 
list directories contents, and handling links somehow is a necessary part 
of that.

-- 
Fabien.