Hello Robert,
> The fact that the return type is not consistently of one type bothers
> me. I'm not sure pgbench's expression language is a good place to
> runtime polymorphism -- SQL doesn't work that way.
Sure.
Pg has a NUMERIC adaptative precision version, which is cheating, because
it can return kind of an "int" or a "float", depending on whether there
are digits after the decimal point or not.
Pgbench does not have support for NUMERIC, just INT & DOUBLE, so the
current version is an approximation of that.
Now it is always possible to just do DOUBLE version, but this won't match
SQL behavior either.
> + /*
> + * pow() for integer values with exp >= 0. Matches SQL pow() behaviour
> + */
>
> What's the name of the backend function whose behavior this matches?
POW(numeric,numeric) -> numeric, which matches "numeric_power".
--
Fabien.
