> Would it make sense that the function returns "const void *", i.e. the cast
> is not on the const part but on the pointer type part?
Or maybe you do not really need a cast, the following code does not
generate any warning when compiled with clang & gcc.
#include <stdio.h>
// const void * would be ok as well void * msg_fun(void) { return "hello world"; }
int main(void) { const char * msg = msg_fun(); printf("message: %s\n", msg); return 0; }
Or basically all is fine, I'm just nitpicking for nothing, shame on me.
As I said, I rather like more precise declarations.
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
