> francolin just showed a non-reproducing failure in the new pgbench tests:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=francolin&dt=2017-09-12%2014%3A00%3A02
> not ok 211 - transaction count for 001_pgbench_log_1.31583 (3)
> # Failed test 'transaction count for 001_pgbench_log_1.31583 (3)'
> # at t/001_pgbench_with_server.pl line 438.
>
> Apparently, one of the threads ran 3 transactions where the test script
> expects it to run at most 2. Is this a pgbench bug, or is the test
> being overoptimistic about how exact the "-T 2" cutoff is?
Probably both? It seems that cutting off on time is not a precise science,
so I suggest to accept 1, 2 and 3 lines, see attached.
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
