> I've got no objection to a more-nearly-TPC-B script as an option.
Good, because adding a "per-spec" tpc-b as an additional builtin option is
one of my intentions, once pgbench is capable of it.
> But why do you feel the need to pull the default script out into
> a separate file? Seems to me that just adds maintenance complexity,
> and the need for pgbench to have a notion of a library directory,
> for little gain.
I tend to agree on this point. Now it could be possible to make pgbench
look for "builtin" scripts in a predefined location so that they are found
easilly, but I'm not sure there would be a significant added value wrt the
current status.
--
Fabien.
