Hello Robert,
> You know, you make comments like this pretty much every time anybody
> suggests that you should change anything in any patch you write.
Well, not everytime...
I'm tired of doing and undoing things: I do a limited A because I'm
cautious not to spend too much time that would go down the drain. Then I'm
told "do A+B" to show that A is worthwhile. Then I'm told "you should not
have done B with A, but submit A for the infrastructure and then B for the
additional features", which was precisely my initial intent...
So this is really the going forward and backwards because of the process
that makes me write these remarks.
> [...] I don't like it when people call my ideas dumb.
Your idea is not dumb, I'm sorry if I have implied that, and I apologise.
I like a clean history as much as everyone else.
Having to unmix features and documentations is still "dumb work", even if
the purpose is not dumb, I stand by this word for this part.
--
Fabien.
