Re: pgbench progress with timestamp - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: pgbench progress with timestamp
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.10.1509091030001.3177@sto
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgbench progress with timestamp  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pgbench progress with timestamp  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> In the sgml, second should be plural in 'intead of the number of second
> since the'.  And 'intead' should be 'instead'.

Ok.

> --progress-timestamp     use a Unix-like epoch timestamp for progress
> reporting
>
> but that is getting pretty long.

Indeed. I've done:
  --progress-timestamp   use Unix epoch timestamps in ms for progress

Here is a v2.

-- 
Fabien.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Shulgin, Oleksandr"
Date:
Subject: Re: On-demand running query plans using auto_explain and signals
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: On-demand running query plans using auto_explain and signals