> On 12/22/13, 2:36 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> I'm not sure whether the policy is to update the version number of the
>> extension for such a change. As the library is always "isn.so", two
>> versions cannot live in parallel anyway. If it is useful, the second
>> patch attached also upgrade the version number.
>
> If you are not changing anything in the SQL, then you don't need to
> change the version number.
Ok, thanks for the information. I understand that the version number is
about the API, not the implementation.
If so, there is only the one-liner patch to consider.
--
Fabien.
