>> I think that it is not that simple: it is a good value to check that the
>> syntax error message conveys a useful information for the user, and that
>> changes to the parser rules do not alter good quality error messages.
>
> It's good to check those things when a feature is implemented. However,
> once it's done, the odds of the bison parser breaking are very low.
I do not know that. When the next version of bison is out (I have 2.5 from
2011 on my laptop, 2.7.1 was released on 2013-04-15), or if a new "super
great acme incredible" drop-in replacement is proposed, you would like to
see the impact, whether positive or negative, it has on error messages
before switching.
> Thus, the benefit of testing that over again thousands of times a day
> is pretty tiny.
Sure, I agree that thousands of times per day is an overkill for syntax
errors. But once in a while would be good, and for that you need to have
them somewhere, and the current status is "nowhere".
--
Fabien.
