Re: Unsigned integer types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: Unsigned integer types
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.02.1305291942590.25496@localhost6.localdomain6
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unsigned integer types  (Maciej Gajewski <maciej.gajewski0@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Unsigned integer types  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I agree that extensions are undermarketed. Although pgxn is a good step, 
I could not find it from "postgresql.org":-(

> I propose to not integrate the unsigned types into existing promotion
> hierarchy, and behave just like gcc would with -Werror: require
> explicit cast. Between them, the unsigned types would be automatically
> converted up (uint2 > uint4 > uint8).

If you do it, having uint1 (1 byte) would be nice as well.

-- 
Fabien.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: XLogInsert scaling, revisited
Next
From: Abhishek Rai
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_replication when standby is unreachable